Incidence Of Opioid Use Disorder Research Articles

Analysis of rising cases of adolescent opioid use presentations to the emergency department and their management

ObjectiveWe sought to answer the question of how adolescents (ages 12–17 years old) with opioid-related presentations are currently managed in the ED. The two main outcomes were the proportion of visits where naloxone and buprenorphine were both used and prescribed, and the rate of revisits to the emergency department in the six months following ED presentation. MethodsThis was a multi-center retrospective cross-sectional study. We studied patients presenting to the ED who were 12–17 years old with an opioid-related presentation. ResultsTwo-hundred and thirty-one patients were identified out of 571 encounters screened. Of these presentations, 77/231 (33%) were girls and 154/231 (67%) were boys. The majority of patients were Latino (64%; n=147); 26% were white (n=59), 6% were middle eastern or Arab (14), and 4% were black (10). Incidence of opioid use disorder per 100,000 presentations increased by 2800% from 2014 to 2022 (21/100,000 +/- 10 [2014] to 600/100,000 +/- 50 [2022]). A plurality of cases was related to opioid withdrawal (42%; 97). On discharge from the ED, 29% of patients received naloxone. For patients in withdrawal, 4% received a prescription for buprenorphine. Twenty-nine percent of patients had a return to the ED in the six months following initial visit. ConclusionsAdolescent opioid-related presentations to the ED are rapidly increasing. Increasing ED presentations, compounded by a high 6-month revisit rate, pose a management challenge amid limited outpatient resources for this population. Opioid agonist therapy and naloxone are not routinely provided. Increasing the use of both are two ways to improve the quality of care for this population.

Characterizing acute and postsurgical pain management in patients receiving buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone

BackgroundThere is currently a clinical dilemma in treating acute pain in patients receiving long-term buprenorphine products. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort review involving patients receiving long-term buprenorphine therapy who either underwent a surgical procedure or presented to an emergency department (ED) for acute pain between January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2022. Patients were excluded if opioids were prescribed 30 days before the index date. Chart reviews were conducted to characterize buprenorphine treatment strategies and the addition of new pain medications. Chart review revealed (1) incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) relapse, (2) hospital re-presentation for pain or OUD, (3) fatal and non-fatal overdose, and (4) all-cause mortality and suicidality. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results. ResultsA total of 70 of 259 screened patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (±SD) age was 50.3 ± 13 years, 92.9% male, 64.3% White, and 78.6% had an OUD diagnosis. While 84.3% presented to the ED, 15.7% underwent surgical procedures. For the primary endpoint, the total daily dose of buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone from index date to discharge was continued in 90.0%, increased in 2.9%, decreased in 1.4%, and discontinued in 5.7% of cases. At discharge, 46.2% were prescribed an additional pain medication. A total of 7.1% re-presented for pain or OUD relapse, 15.7% experienced an OUD relapse, 1.4% experienced new-onset suicidality, and 1.4% experience all-cause mortality within 90 days of the index date. No fatal or non-fatal opioid overdoses were observed. ConclusionThe most commonly observed practice was continuing buprenorphine doses in patients with acute or postsurgical pain, which was effective and safe. Although further data is necessary to fully elucidate these findings, the data herein may suggest that clinicians can safely continue buprenorphine doses in the acute pain setting in patients receiving these products chronically.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns After Imposition of Setting-Specific Limits on Prescription Duration

Despite their widespread adoption across the US, policies imposing one-size-fits-all limits on the duration of prescriptions for opioids have shown modest and mixed implications for prescribing. To assess whether a prescription duration limit policy tailored to different clinical settings was associated with shorter opioid prescription lengths. This cross-sectional study examined changes in opioid prescribing patterns for opioid-naive Medicaid enrollees aged 12 to 64 years before and after implementation of a statewide prescription duration limit policy in West Virginia in June 2018. Patients with cancer or Medicare coverage were excluded. The policy assigned a 7-day duration limit to opioid prescriptions for adults treated in outpatient hospital- or office-based practices, a 4-day limit for adults treated in emergency departments, and a 3-day limit for pediatric patients younger than 18 years regardless of clinical setting. Data were examined from January 1, 2017, through September 30, 2019, and data were analyzed from June 12 to October 30, 2023. Whether a patient's initial opioid prescription was longer in days than the June 2018 policy limit for a given care setting before and after policy implementation. Interrupted time series models were used to calculate the association between the policy's implementation and outcomes. The analytic sample included 44 703 Medicaid enrollees (27 957 patients [62.5%] before policy implementation and 16 746 patients [37.5%] after policy implementation; mean [SD] age, 33.9 [13.4] years; 27 461 females [61.4%]). Among adults treated in outpatient hospital- or office-based settings, the duration limit policy was associated with a decrease of 8.83 (95% CI, -10.43 to -7.23) percentage points (P < .001), or a 56.8% relative reduction, in the proportion of prescriptions exceeding the 7-day limit. In the emergency department setting, the policy was associated with a decrease of 7.03 (95% CI, -10.38 to -3.68) percentage points (P < .001), a 37.5% relative reduction, in the proportion of prescriptions exceeding the 4-day limit. The proportion of pediatric opioid prescriptions longer than the 3-day limit decreased by 12.80 (95% CI, -17.31 to -8.37) percentage points (P < .001), a 26.5% relative reduction, after the policy's implementation. Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that opioid prescription duration limits tailored to different clinical settings are associated with reduced length of prescriptions for opioid-naive patients. Additional research is needed to evaluate whether these limits are associated with reductions in the incidence of opioid use disorder or with unintended consequences, such as shifts to illicit opioids.

Women and Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Contributors to Treatment Success From the Perspectives of Women in Recovery, Women With Past Attempts in Drug Treatment, and Health and Criminal Justice Professionals.

The disproportionate incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and the alarming increases in opioid-related overdose deaths among women highlight a clear need for the expansion of effective harm reduction and treatment practices. Research supports medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) as an effective intervention; however, with low rates of utilization of such, there is a need to identify factors that facilitate MOUD treatment uptake and retention for women. Thus, the current study examines contributors to treatment success through the triangulation of perspectives from affected women as well as health and criminal justice professionals. Interviews (N = 42) were conducted from May to July 2022 with women in recovery who previously used or currently use MOUD (N = 10), women who currently use opioids who terminated a MOUD program previously (N = 10), SUD treatment professionals (N = 12), and criminal justice professionals who work with women who use opioids (N = 10). Interviews for all participants centered around their backgrounds, perceived barriers and facilitators to MOUD treatment, and issues specific to women in treatment for substance use disorder. We used a thematic qualitative data analysis process to analyze transcripts. Participants highlighted contributors to treatment success from 3 domains: (1) internal processes (including promoting self-efficacy and setting realistic goals), (2) access to resources (including material resources, such as food and shelter, educational resources and social support), and (3) treatment structure (such as treatment type and protocol). Internal processes, access to resources, and treatment structure contribute to MOUD treatment success for women with OUD. Structured support where experiences are shared, and realistic goals are set, may promote feelings of acceptance and empowerment, thereby bolstering chances of treatment success. Additionally, the court system can promote evidence-based and trauma-informed substance use treatment and provide accessible educational resources related to substance use to extend these benefits to more women.

Responding to the US opioid crisis: leveraging analytics to support decision making.

The US is experiencing a severe opioid epidemic with more than 80,000 opioid overdose deaths occurring in 2022. Beyond the tragic loss of life, opioid use disorder (OUD) has emerged as a major contributor to morbidity, lost productivity, mounting criminal justice system costs, and significant social disruption. This Current Opinion article highlights opportunities for analytics in supporting policy making for effective response to this crisis. We describe modeling opportunities in the following areas: understanding the opioid epidemic (e.g., the prevalence and incidence of OUD in different geographic regions, demographics of individuals with OUD, rates of overdose and overdose death, patterns of drug use and associated disease outbreaks, and access to and use of treatment for OUD); assessing policies for preventing and treating OUD, including mitigation of social conditions that increase the risk of OUD; and evaluating potential regulatory and criminal justice system reforms.

Opioid use disorder at delivery hospitalization in the United States: 2012-2016.

The objective of this paper is to evaluate national trends, socioeconomic risk factors, and maternal and obstetric outcomes for patients with and without opioid use disorder (OUD) at delivery hospitalization. This is a retrospective cohort using the National Inpatient Sample 2012-2016 of 3,554,477 deliveries to analyze trends in OUD in patients at delivery hospitalization. We conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression to compare clinical, demographic, hospital, and geographic associations for patients with OUD during delivery hospitalization. The incidence of OUD at delivery hospitalization increased from 4.48 per 1000 deliveries in 2012 to 7.67 in 2016. The highest rate of OUD was in the Northeast and the lowest in the West (9.29 vs. 4.13 per 1000, respectively, p < .001). After adjusting for confounders, history of concurrent cocaine use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.38-6.59), sedative use (aOR = 17.28, 95% CI: 14.71-20.31), and amphetamine use (aOR = 4.05, 95% CI: 3.71-4.43), were strongly associated with OUD. Additionally, hepatitis C infection, (aOR = 21.98, 95% CI: 20.89-23.11), white race (aOR = 3.12, 95% CI: 3.00-3.24), and public insurance (aOR = 3.92, 95% CI: 3.77-4.08) were also associated with OUD. The continued increase in rates of OUD at delivery hospitalization and its association with adverse perinatal outcomes highlights the need for universal screening and resource allocation for programs directed toward pregnant people. Our study builds upon the prior literature that reports trends in OUD at delivery hospitalization from 1998 to 2011 as well as presents a more in-depth look at risk factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes than previously reported.

Methadone Maintenance Therapy after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Case Report

There is limited information on the effects of continued methadone maintenance therapy following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, with the increasing incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) in the US, there is a need to define best practices for the management of pain and prevention of acute withdrawal syndrome in patients with pre-existing OUD who develop aSAH.  In this case report, we describe the use of MMT in a patient with aSAH and discuss important considerations, including sedation or confusion that might mimic acute neurologic changes seen in cerebral vasospasm or delayed cerebral ischemia, cardiac complications related to QTc prolongation, and liver or kidney interactions associated with aSAH routine treatment. Our patient recovered from her aSAH without any adverse events and, with increased monitoring and collaborative team-based care, including input from those with expertise in OMD or aSAH, we believe MMT can be safely continued in most aSAH patients.

An Immunconjugate Vaccine Alters Distribution and Reduces the Antinociceptive, Behavioral and Physiological Effects of Fentanyl in Male and Female Rats.

Fentanyl (FEN) is a potent synthetic opioid associated with increasing incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and fatal opioid overdose. Vaccine immunotherapy for FEN-associated disorders may be a viable therapeutic strategy. Here, we expand and confirm our previous study in mice showing immunological and antinociception efficacy of our FEN vaccine administered with the adjuvant dmLT. In this study, immunized male and female rats produced significant levels of anti-FEN antibodies that were highly effective at neutralizing FEN-induced antinociception in the tail flick assay and hot plate assays. The vaccine also decreased FEN brain levels following drug administration. Immunization blocked FEN-induced, but not morphine-induced, rate-disrupting effects on schedule-controlled responding. Vaccination prevented decreases on physiological measures (oxygen saturation, heart rate) and reduction in overall activity following FEN administration in male rats. The impact of FEN on these measures was greater in unvaccinated male rats compared to unvaccinated female rats. Cross-reactivity assays showed anti-FEN antibodies bound to FEN and sufentanil but not to morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, or oxycodone. These data support further clinical development of this vaccine to address OUD in humans.

MT12 Changes in Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients Using an FDA-Authorized Prescription Digital Therapeutic for Opioid Use Disorder over a 12-Month Period

The rising incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) in the U.S. places a substantial burden on the healthcare system. This study examined changes in all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients prescribed an FDA-authorized prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) for OUD.

Incidence of opioid use disorder in the year after discharge from an emergency department encounter.

ObjectiveTherapeutic opioid exposure is associated with long‐term use. How much later use is due to opioid use disorder (OUD) and the incidence of OUD without preceding therapeutic exposure are unknown. We preliminarily explored the association between emergency department opioid prescriptions and subsequent OUD.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study queried electronic health records for discharged adult patients in the year before (2014) and after (2016) their first encounter in 2015 at either of 2 EDs in a Midwestern healthcare system. OUD was defined by diagnosis codes and prescription history. Patients with OUD history before the index encounter were excluded. We report OUD incidence within 1 year, with time to first indicator of OUD among those with a repeat health system encounter post index using a Cox proportional hazards model. Secondary outcomes were sources of therapeutic opioid exposure and frequency of risk factors associated with OUD among those who developed OUD.ResultsOf the 49,904 unique, adult ED patients without history of OUD, 669 (1.3%; 95% CI, 1.2–1.4) had health records indicating OUD within 12 months. The proportion of ED patients with OUD at 12 months was 1.5% (95% CI, 1.2–1.9) if prescribed an opioid at index and 1.3% (95% CI, 1.2–1.4) if not. Of the 669 who developed OUD, 80 (12.0%) were prescribed an opioid at the index ED visit, 54 (8%) received an opioid prescription at a subsequent ED visit, and median time to OUD was 4.5 months (interquartile range 1.6‐7.6, range 0.0–11.9). When controlling for demographics, mental health, and prior opioid prescriptions, there was no difference in OUD incidence between patients who did or did not receive an initial ED opioid prescription (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9–1.4).ConclusionsA small but meaningful proportion of the ED population will develop OUD within 1 year even without ED opioid prescription. Though we found no association between ED opioid prescription and later OUD, further study is warranted given the complexity factors influencing OUD incidence, ongoing ED opioid exposure, and limitations inherent to this study design.

Laser meridian massage decreased craving in men with opioid use disorder on methadone maintenance treatment

BackgroundThe incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasing worldwide, and the opioid-related overdose crisis is currently a major global challenge. This study investigated the effects of adjuvant laser meridian massage (LMM) in men with OUD undergoing methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). MethodsA case-controlled study was conducted from February 2019 to April 2020. Fourteen men with OUD on MMT were enrolled from an addiction treatment center as an experimental group. An age-matched control group comprising 13 men was also enrolled. The experimental group received LMM on the back, including over the Bladder meridian and Governor Vessel, three times weekly for 4 weeks. The control group received only MMT. Urinary morphine levels, patients’ self-reports of the number of episodes or days of heroin use, and visual analog scale scores for heroin craving/refusal to use heroin during the previous week were evaluated. Quality of life was reported using the Short Form (SF)-12v2. ResultsThe experimental group showed a significant decrease in heroin use (p < 0.05), whereas the control group showed a significant increase in heroin craving (p < 0.05). The SF-12v2 Health Survey revealed a significant improvement in physical health in the experimental group (P < 0.05). ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that laser meridian massage can be considered a safe, well-tolerated, and potentially useful adjuvant intervention for opioid use disorder.

Barriers to accessing opioid agonist therapy in pregnancy

The incidence of opioid use disorder during pregnancy has risen dramatically in the last couple of decades. Despite the safety and efficacy of treatment for opioid use during pregnancy, pregnant women often cannot access treatment. This study aimed to determine the availability of opioid agonist therapy to pregnant women in Missouri and Illinois and to compare different markers of treatment accessibility between opioid treatment programs and buprenorphine providers and between rural and urban practices. Buprenorphine providers and opioid treatment programs in Missouri and Illinois were identified using the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration website. A phone audit was conducted to evaluate barriers to care, including whether clinics accepted new patients, pregnant patients, and insurance, and the time to the first appointment and appointment cost. Rural-urban commuting area codes and practice ZIP codes were used to determine whether practice location was rural or urban. Provider specialty was determined from state licensing databases. There were 1363 buprenorphine providers and 98 opioid treatment programs listed. Clinics were clustered around metropolitan areas, and only 13% of buprenorphine providers (183 of 1363) and 5% of opioid treatment programs (5 of 98) were in rural areas. Despite 3 contact attempts for each clinic, we were unable to reach 42% of buprenorphine providers (401 of 965) and 14% of opioid treatment programs (14 of 98). Of those reached, 40% of buprenorphine providers (223 of 564) and 80% of opioid treatment programs (67 of 84) were accepting new pregnant patients (P=.01). Buprenorphine providers required more contact attempts (>2 attempts in 34% vs 15%; P<.0001) and had longer wait times for the first appointment (>7 days in 27% vs 4%; P=.002) than opioid treatment programs. Buprenorphine providers in urban areas required more attempts to reach (>2 attempts in 36% vs 24%; P=.03) and were less likely to accept Medicaid than those in rural areas (52% vs 74%; P=.008). More than 23% of buprenorphine provider listings (238 of 1038) contained incorrect information, whereas no opioid treatment program listing had incorrect information. Most buprenorphine providers were in primary care or psychiatry, whereas <5% of buprenorphine providers (43 of 1363) were obstetrician-gynecologists. This is the first phone audit to evaluate access to opioid agonist therapy for pregnant women. Only a minority of buprenorphine providers offered care for this patient population, and a large proportion required multiple contact attempts and wait times of >7 days. Opioid treatment programs were more responsive and accepting of new pregnant patients but comprised a minority of clinics and were predominately located in urban areas. There is an urgent need for improved reliability of contact information for opioid agonist providers, timely intake and acceptance for treatment of pregnant patients, and overall improved access to clinics that are challenged by geographic and insurance status barriers.

Emerging Viral and Bacterial Infections: Within an Era of Opioid Epidemic

The opioid epidemic is a public health crisis that continues to impact healthcare in the United States of America (USA). While changes in opioid prescribing have curbed the medical use of opioids, the increase in nonmedical use, largely driven by injection drug use (IDU), has contributed to the escalating incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD). Furthermore, IDU is associated with high-risk injection practices that can increase the risk of acquiring viral and bacterial infections. Here in this comprehensive review, we aimed to summarize the epidemiology and management of OUD, along with the screening and antimicrobial treatment of associated infections, specifically focused on human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, skin and soft tissue infections, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis. Medication-assisted therapy (MAT) and infection guidelines from the USA will be presented.

The Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use Disorder on Complications and Costs following Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Introduction Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients taking opioids in the preoperative period are at elevated risk for complications following total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. However, the incidence and impact of opioid use disorder (OUD) among these patients—both clinically and fiscally—remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship. Methods The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was used to identify patients undergoing THA and TKA from 2011 to 2015. Coarsened exact matching was used to statistically match the OUD and non-OUD cohorts. Further analysis was then conducted on matched cohorts with multivariate analysis. The incidence of OUD was also determined, and the costs associated with this comorbidity were calculated. Results The incidence of OUD in arthroplasty patients increased 80% over the study period. OUD patients had higher odds of prosthetic joint infection (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.23–1.94), wound complication (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12–1.76), prosthetic complication (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.10–1.70), and revision surgery (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19–1.81). OUD patients also had longer length of stays (TKA: +0.67 days; THA: +1.09 days), higher readmission (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.43–1.79), and increased 90-day costs (TKA: +$3,602 [95% CI $3,138–4,065]; THA: +4,527 [95% CI $3,593–4,920). Conclusion Opioid use disorder is becoming a more common comorbidity among THA and TKA patients. This is concerning as it represents a significant risk factor for postoperative complication. It additionally confers increased perioperative costs. Patients with OUD should be counseled on their elevated risk, and future work will be needed to determine if this is a modifiable risk factor.

Assessing Patients' Risk for Opioid Use Disorder.

Opioid use disorder and opioid misuse continue to increase rapidly in prevalence in North America. Nurses play a critical role in managing pain in patients who are at risk for opioid use disorder. The interplay of pain and opioid use disorder provides nurses with an opportunity to address urgent needs while treating patients across the continuum of care. This article reviews strategies for assessing risk for opioid use disorder while treating patients with pain. Implementing these approaches into daily nursing practice may improve patient care and help reduce the incidence of opioid use disorder.

Pain monitor: reality or fantasy in ambulatory patients.

In an unconscious patient, there can be significant challenges to monitoring nociception and proper dosing of analgesic medications. The traditional measures of intraoperative nociception have poor sensitivity and specificity with little predictive value in postoperative outcomes such as postoperative pain, opioid-induced side effects, length of stay or incidence of opioid use disorder. To date, several monitoring modalities are in development to establish objective measures of the balance between nociception and analgesia with the goal of guiding anesthesiologists and improve patient outcomes. In this review, some of the most promising monitoring modalities are discussed with the most recent findings. Multiple modalities are beginning to demonstrate utility compared with traditional care. Most, but not all, of these studies show decreased intraoperative opioid use and some show lower pain scores and opioid requirements in the postanesthesia care unit. Recent evidence points to promising efficacy for these monitoring modalities; however, this field is in its infancy. More investigation is required to demonstrate differences in outcome compared with traditional care, and these differences need to be of sufficient import to achieve widespread adoption.

Factors Associated with Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis and Treatment Progress

Previous research has shown that various environmental aspects, such as a history of abuse, trauma, and pain can influence the incidence of opioid use disorder (OUD). The aims of this study were to determine risk factors associated specifically with opioid use disorder, and to identify factors that may predict treatment progress for opioid use disorder patients. Three-hundred six patients from an abstinence-based residential treatment center participated in this study. Participants completed a comprehensive battery, which included measures assessing quality of life, craving, abstinence self-efficacy, adverse childhood experiences, trauma exposure, and physical pain symptoms at treatment intake and again after 28 days of treatment. Independent t-test results showed significant differences between patients with and without opioid use disorders in social relationships, confidence abstaining from alcohol and drugs, pain intensity, and drug craving. Multiple regression analyses demonstrated that presence of an opioid use disorder predicted alcohol abstinence, social relationships, and baseline environment. Results revealed shifting attitudes towards substance use and social relationships during the opioid group’s time in treatment. Cravings and urges were identified as important focuses for future treatment of opioid use disorder. Hyperalgesia was seen as an effect of extended opioid use and its impact decreased through drug abstinence. Limitations included a small sample size, a large proportion of wealthy individuals, and age differences between the two groups. 

Trends in prior receipt of prescription opioid or adjuvant analgesics among patients with incident opioid use disorder or opioid-related overdose from 2006 to 2016

BackgroundWith increasing efforts to scrutinize and reduce opioid prescribing, limited data exist on the recent trend in receipt of prescription pain medications before diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) or opioid-related overdose (OD). MethodsUsing 2005–2016 Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims databases, we assessed trends in annual 1) incidence of OUD or OD and 2) prevalence of receipt of prescription opioids or four commonly-prescribed adjuvant analgesics among patients newly diagnosed with OUD/OD. Trends were examined in the overall sample and by 3 age groups, including youths (≤18 years), adults (19–64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). ResultsThe incidence of diagnosed OUD or OD increased more than 3-fold from 4.99 to 23.81 per 10,000 persons from 2006 to 2016, with the highest increase (14.18-fold) seen in older adults, followed by adults (3.53-fold), and youths (0.16-fold). Between 2006 and 2016, the proportion of patients with incident OUD/OD who received anticonvulsant adjuvant analgesics in the year before diagnosis increased (from 23.4% to 34.3% [P-trend = .005]) whereas the proportion receiving high-dose prescriptions opioids decreased (from 45.5% to 34.8% [P-trend =< .001]). A decreasing trend was observed in general for tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. DiscussionIn US commercially insured patients newly diagnosed with OUD/OD, receipt of high-dose opioid prescriptions preceding the diagnosis decreased over time, paralleled by increased use of anticonvulsants commonly prescribed for pain conditions. Further investigations are warranted to understand how prescribed and anticonvulsants contribute to the development of OUD/OD.